Mutiny
The last time I wrote was just before Kellie and I went to Reno for our critical care conference. We took Amtrak’s California Zephyr up to Reno, leaving from Roseville. Our train was delayed around an hour, and we got in a couple hours late. It was scenic, especially with the recent snow on the ground through the Sierras. The night we arrived, we met up with my sister Terri and her husband Patrick, who live in Reno. We went out to eat and saw the movie Wild Hogs… a very funny movie. We stayed at the WorldMark Resort, which was a couple blocks away from Harrah’s, where the conferences were at. The conference ran through Wednesday that week. We again took the train on the way back. The train was supposed to have arrived at 9:20AM, but it was delayed until 1:45PM… after we were scheduled to arrive. We were going quite slow and just outside of Colfax, we were completely stopped for around an hour, awaiting Union Pacific to finish clearing the track of maintenance. They finally decided to switch us to the other track to bypass the construction. In my opinion, this was just more evidence in a feud between Amtrak and Union Pacific over the use of the rails. To those that are unaware, except for a line on the East Coast, Amtrak does not have its own tracks and uses freight train tracks to cross the country. Passenger trains are considered an annoyance by the freight train companies, but continue to exist due to government regulation. Anyway, we did not get home until around 7PM or so.
While we were at the conference, we started our next class from the University of Phoenix. This was a class I felt should be a fun class. It is finally a class that is relevant to my area of nursing; assessments. It was a little inconvenient to start the class while away from home, but we tried to manage. In this class, instead of having an electronic text book, we had to purchase a physical book. We only purchased one to save some money. We found that sharing a physical book was a little more of a challenge than printing out our own copies from the computer. It also made it harder to find specific text in the book. For the first week, we had to read the first seven chapters of the book and we had a paper we had to write on our definition of health. The paper was to give our definition of health, taking a nursing theorists view. We were then to describe two of our health-promoting behaviors and two detrimental behaviors and then discuss how to make the detrimental behaviors health-promoting behaviors. The entire paper was supposed to be about us individually, but we were not allowed to mention or reference that the paper was about us. This was kind of confusing. The teacher also mentioned that the paper was not about the World Health Organization’s definition of health, but our definition of health, based in nursing theory. In my paper, I decided to list different definitions of the word health. In the manner in which I wrote my paper, I did not state that any one definition was correct; I just mentioned that they were different views. I cited the World Health Organization’s definition as one of those that exist, as did I cite Wikipedia. Ordinarily, Wikipedia is not a valid academic source for fact, but as what I was using it for was an opinion, it should be a valid source for an opinion. The reason Wikipedia is not valid for academic fact is that it is editable by anyone and opinions may influence the “facts.” I wrote my instructor to state WHY I cited the World Health Organization and Wikipedia in my paper. In my opinion, I was in compliance with the syllabus, but wanted to ask the teacher to clarify a portion of the syllabus. The teacher replied irrelevant information and instead of clarifying the syllabus, she copied and pasted a portion of the syllabus. This made me quite upset. The teacher had not only not answered the question, but basically just said to read the syllabus. The problem was, the syllabus was not clear enough. I remained civil with a response back, again asking my question. She again was quite rude and disrespectful in her response. This began a trend. The instructor for the course frequently went out of her way to condescend students in the class. When we asked her questions, she would make a reply, but never an answer to the question being asked. The teacher’s attitude was quite hostile and made this course that I had been looking forward to, be the worst class ever. The teacher’s constant condescending attitude left many questions unasked. I had questions about the second paper due as well, but tried to just “tough it out” as the teacher was worthless in asking anything. Several people asked questions, but she would reply that the information was in the syllabus and if they had a problem complying with the syllabus that they should contact their academic adviser about their future at the University. Kellie and I both received lower than desirable scores on our next paper, due to being unable to read the teachers mind. We both had had enough abuse from this teacher. We decided that we needed to just drop the class, despite being told we would have to pay cash for the price of the class. We filed a complaint against this instructor. Thankfully, we were given a “get out of jail free card.” If all goes as planned, we will re-start the assessment course this next Tuesday at no financial loss. Apparently, several more students from that class have dropped as well. The reason people are not passing her class is not because students are not intelligent enough or the subject matter is difficult for students to understand, but that the teacher demeans and insults students and refuses to answer their questions. This is my definition of a bad instructor. I would not be surprised if there are more students joining the “mutiny.”